Find a Lawyer

IMRAN ALI versus MST. IFFAT SIDDIQUI

Sections 12, 25 and 47 of the West Pakistan Family Courts Act (XXXV of 1964), Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Appointment of the guardian and the custody of minors were the age of one minor when he was about 8 years old. The other 5 were about 1/2 a year old Petitioner, the father of minors, there were enough resources to take care of his minor children's welfare, and according to his own profession he was born Earlier, he was also known for providing better resources. There was no evidence that the mother was temporarily in custody, during the custody of the mother, the minor was going to school with the minor's mother living with her three brothers, one of whom was a convicted person and abroad. Was a country. The record also showed that the father's family environment was better for the children's future development as the father's mother was the principal of the school, his older brother was running his own school and another brother was studying in Australia. Income was a great source of income for the well-being of the father's minor children, the father and the mother were equally in love with the children; His father was required to be presented in accordance with both sects / religions while his mother was a minor. Temporarily handing over the matter said that the facts and circumstances had not been considered and that there was false evidence available on the record and that he had not properly appreciated the evidence. Prayer was allowed as requested by the father and he was a minor pakistani advocates Saidu Sharif lawyer