Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD KAUSAR versus RABIA KAUSAR

Section 5, Schedule to the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for dissolution of marriage The application for separation of yarn ex parte decree was filed by the Family Court after the former person was convicted of the offense. The same judge dismissed the Family Court without seeking response from the suit wives to dissolve and dismissed the application by invalid order stating that there was no provision for review in the special law, the family court's order in the constitutional petition Was challenged to file a separate application for a prior decision and the decree governing their terms and conditions. Words was clear. The petition sought to be kept and reminded of the preceding partial verdict and decree, but the Family Court did not even read that the application was used by the Family Court to selectively modify the strange words S and It was rejected. The husband's request to set aside the previous judgment and injunction in Lemon W, even considering the claims and pleas contained by the trial court on the level of treatment of this case, classically - the misuse of the law, the issue. Disregard and consequently had to perform the duty of judge as a judge who was bound to have the least reading. Consider, and then decide the matter, the requirements of law and justice were ignored, the family court not only misused its jurisdiction because of the clear withdrawal of circumstances, but also because of it. Had also failed to perform the basic duties, without the legal injunction, of legal authority, clearly, of any legal effect top advocate from Tharparkar lawyer