RANA GHULAM MUSTAFA versus STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION CIVIL LINE, LAHORE
Section 154 Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 420/468/471/419/452/148 Police Rules, 1934, R25 2 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Request Second FIR, both sides including Section H The registration of A did not disclose the actual facts and suppressed the truth until the Additional Sessions Judge tried to hide something in an unknown order because the duration of his two orders was inconsistent and the parties concerned with the sale of teeth. The clinic versions offered by the disputing parties were separate from each other and the applicant (buyer) version was submitted to the complainant (seller) of the pre-listed FIR. This version cannot be treated as an extension so it was directed to execute the order of the Additional Sessions Judge, FIR lodged on the complaint of the Senior Justice and Applicant of the applicant and adhered to the requirements and mandate. Constitutional application allowed in accordance with the provisions of R25 2 of the F Police Rules 1934 for the investigation of the second FIR
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
