Find a Lawyer

MASOOD FAROOQ versus CENTRAL SELECTION BOARD THROUGH CHAIRMAN, FEDERAL PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION, ISLAMABAD

The Section 9 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), the Section 4 Promotion Intelligence Appeal to Service Tribunal Appellant, which was the officer of the Central Superior Services, Postal Group, was promoted to BPS 18 and the Postal Group BP. According to S19's seniority list, the appellant was senior to the respondents, which appellant's seniority was retained on the respondents, the appellant was not considered to be promoted at the Central Selection Board meeting, as he The notification was approved by the competent authority according to the notification of 69, the extension of the respondents. BPS 20, but through this notification, the appellant was ordered to be fired. Appellant had put in at least 17 years of qualifying service, which was a necessary consideration for development in BPS 20 and Had achieved a score of 70 and such situation was not short. This requires the extent to which appellant has consistently received complimentary reports throughout his career, and has been well-positioned to develop permanently in the years preceding his term in the year of his superannuation. And even then, in the last recorded Appellant's Record, no negative entry of any kind has been disclosed which can be justified. His superannuation appellant had a completely unmatched service record while seniority must be determined by the standard of development while seniority was also a key factor that must be acknowledged when completing other academic factors. Important matters, though important, should be to put them in the back seat. The appellant, who confessed that the defendant's m best law firm from Khanbel lawyer