Find a Lawyer

MST. FARIDA BANO versus KARACHI ELECTRIC SUPPLY CORPORATION

Section 1 Electricity Rules, 1937, RR 49 (3) and 76 Damage Recovery Theory Reza Ipsa Locator applies Direct lines of electricity supply, protection against the defendants were the legal heirs of the deceased, Were killed due to confusion of electrolysis. Hanging with an electric pole and lying on the road, it was raised by the defendants that their forerunner's interest in death was due to the negligence of the defendants. Defendants were required to provide equipment for security purposes, but did not do so, which neglected them. In part I, the defendants failed to mention the reasons for the electrical wire fall, under the theory of race ipsa loquitur, that the defendants needed to prove that the accident did not occur because of their negligence. Aliens were shown negligence and such negligence resulted in the death of the deceased, as the legal heir of the deceased was entitled to compensation claim and the suit was ordered according to the damages. Finger solicitors from Tibba Sultanpur lawyer