Find a Lawyer

ABDUL MATEEN versus MUHAMMAD AKHTAR

Article 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Application for Payment of Constitutional Application Wages Ex parte order Ex parte order was issued in order to issue a notice under S: 15 Application under the Payment of Wages Act 1936 I did not appear, responding to such notice was served well by the respondent authority on the defendant and the order to continue the case was granted and the request was granted when thereafter proceedings. When it was launched, in order to recover a complimentary amount against the respondents, they petitioned to keep the ex parte order separate. Was filed. , Which allowed that the applicant filed a constitutional petition against the order separating the previous order, the authority was required to take action under the provisions of the law, no discrimination was affirmed and Expectations from public workers who were required to work fairly and implicitly. While strictly fulfilling its duties as required by law, however, it will neither make sense nor will it mean that all requests to disassociate prior orders should either be allowed or denied. Every matter should be considered, examined, and after the serious act of the mind should be decided on its own merits, in both cases there was no case of discrimination in the situation of discrimination. The cases were excluded accordingly famous supreme court advocate from Kurram Agency lawyer