Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MUSTAFA WASSAN versus ABDUL SALAM TAHEEM

Sections 14 (5) and 99 Acceptance of Nomination Acceptance Appeal against nomination papers was accepted by the applicants, the appellant filed an appeal against the order of acceptance The appellant alleged that the defendant was not a public liability. And was involved in criminal activities. That he was a fugitive and he was not a good character. And that he did not declare false when submitting the nomination papers, the correctness of the respondent did not prove wrong because he had submitted documents which showed that he was not the exclusive owner of the property, but only the participant. Was a partner and if the amount owed was distributed among the representative co-owners, the representation was less than the amount determined by sub-section (t) of section 99 of 1976, in a criminal case. Ali's involvement was not enough to disqualify him. To contest the election, unless it is convicted by the court of competent jurisdiction and convicted, the respondent has been absconding and absconding with the law and his property is not connected, it cannot be said that He was a man of good character, before the respondent secretly appeared before the court. After submitting his nomination papers, he was granted bail; the respondent, in the circumstances, was not eligible to be elected or elected to the Assembly. The nomination papers were rejected power of attorney advocate Nilore lawyer