STATE versus ABDUL SALAM ALVI
Increase in Articles 324/149, 337 F (iii), 337 F (i) and 148 sentences, denial of the fourteen accused included in the FIR was acquitted and five, the present respondents, were tried and convicted. Was heard. The court, which sought to increase the conviction, did not challenge the success of the nine accused, the trial court acquitted the accused respondents under section 7 of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 for good reasons. That was, the trial court appeals denied the weapons of the accused, who were against the fate of the offenders in the surrender of crime under the Illegal Arms Act 1991, had already been dismissed by the High Court. And paid for it. Six years had passed since the date of the incident, a larger number of accused than the present accused, had already been acquitted by the trial court. Evidence was not appropriate at this stage to increase the conviction of the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
inheritance advocates near Jhang lawyer
