CITY EDUCATION BOARD (REGISTERED) SIALKOT THROUGH DIRECTOR versus MST. MAQBOOL NASREEN
Sections 12 of the Code of Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 17 (2) (a) and 79 suits, are accused of specific performance of a contract of sale agreement alleging that the defendant plaintiff was an illiterate woman. Had requested that she could just stick to it. The signature that her husband had obtained on the blank papers for use in the plaintiff's case against her defendant, which was disclosed in court and is a minor testimony of the agreement, while the other is a minor. The witness has died with those women who are not in the independent counsel of their trusted person, Section 7 of the law testimony, 1984 1984 1984 requires proof of document by at least two witnesses, Documents of agreement cannot be substituted for trivial testimony, nor can the testimony of another margin be presented. The plaintiff's death was fatal because the plaintiff could inspect a person to prove his or her signature through the signature of a marginalized witness, according to the plaintiff, the contract stamps were purchased by his clerk. , And the magistrate used to go to his chamber, but he did not enter the witness box to prove his signature, the contract did not prove in accordance with Art Act 17 of the legal evidence, therefore, his specific performance could not be enforced. Was \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Adda Jahan Khan lawyer
