Find a Lawyer

MST. SAFIA BEGUM versus MUHAMMAD AJMAL

Section 12 of the Act provides for evidence (Art. 10 (1984)), art 17 (2) (a) and 79 of the specific performance of the contract to sell to the vendor, a portions woman, who refuses to enforce the contract through the vendor. Yes, the author's contract was a lawyer, who did not know that the seller was not with the male shopkeeper, not with a male member, when he did not contract and the seller did not belong to the seller. The witness was his father after entering the witness room, while the other minor witness was the seller's step brother. Non-entry into the witness box The minority agreement was not proved by presenting two minor witnesses as convention was in accordance with Article 17 of the testimony, which cannot be partially treated with the 1984 Advocate in which the lawyer's statement is recorded It would have no identifiable value because it was not. There was no independent advice available to the shopkeeper for a court inspection, which was not with his father or another vendor of his confidence the vendor failed to prove he agreed that the suit was dismissed. Done advocate from Ghotki lawyer