AHSAN SABIR versus STATE
Section 6161 AA & 265K Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), the action occurred after dark in the month of February 302, and the perpetrators of the alleged murder could not be identified on the spot. The person who was not named in the IR was first exposed the case through an application submitted by the victim's mother to the Investigation Officer in which he alleged that the accused's mother was involved in the case. An additional judicial confession was made earlier regarding the accused involved in the murder. Before the investigating officer did not indicate the date or time of the extra-judicial confession by the accused's mother, the details of the alleged role or the role played by the accused were not mentioned. Yes, it was said that no other piece of evidence was available on the extra-judicial confession. Extra judicial confession was a very weak type of evidence, and it was sufficient to record the crime in the absence of any other piece of evidence. The weakness of the alleged extra-judicial confession in the case was pursued. The fact is that the accused did not do so in these cases, there was no possibility or possibility of recording the conviction of the accused through a trial court petition to halt the trial and the trial under Section 26565 under the accused. The petition was filed in court. The CRPC was accepted and the accused acquitted, under circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates email from Bisham lawyer