Find a Lawyer

MESSRS EKON YAPI ONARIM TICARET VE SANAYI LTD. THROUGH MANAGING DIRECTOR versus MESSRS SEZAI TURKES FEYZI AKKAYA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY

O XXXIX, Rr 1, 2 and O XXXVIII, R 5 Respondent An overseas company was contracted by the Port Authority as a contractor for the appellant who completed the assignment but the respondent appellant. Failure to pay Defendant's order of restraining order to prevent appellant from issuing money was also requested to allow respondent to fulfill the final order in favor of the appellant or to withdraw his assets outside the court's jurisdiction. The security will have to be submitted to the court to prevent its removal, while further refusal. The court did not attend the trial. The property stated that damages could be quantified in the case of money, which would result in no irreparable loss / injury to the appellant whose claim was denied by the respondent, to record the evidence. The latter requires commitment so there is no first party / argument. Was excluded, therefore, the trial secret record revealed that the plaintiff company was facing bankruptcy proceedings which, for example, was delayed by a commercial court for example for one year so that some arrears. Loans could be eliminated, in the circumstances, orders could be made within the R5 parameters. O XXXVIII, CPC Appeal Request Under OO XXXVIII, R 5, CPC will be considered pending \ r \ n \ r \ n immigration advocate from Orakzai lawyer