FOZIA PERVEEN versus JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE SECTION 30, KHUSHAB
Section 164 Constitution Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Recording of the Second Statement The petitioner directed the magistrate to record his second statement under section 164 through his constitutional petition, the PC Magistrate in his order The second statement was refused to be recorded. No motivating reason for this was denied. The applicant alleged that when he was first produced before the magistrate for recording his statement, he was not a free agent because the site was abducted and section 164 was compelled to make a statement, CR The PC did not identify it. The applicants' statements cannot be recorded under the said section; in any case, if it is already listed, at the present time, when the applicant had the opportunity, he would have joined his parents and they would have Describing what happened to him, there was no bar to record the second statement under section 160. CCP, the application was allowed and the order to refuse to record the second statement of the magistrate, according to the jurisdiction, to the magistrate to record the applicant's statement in accordance with law under section 164, CR PC Was set aside, with instructions \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
