Find a Lawyer

MESSRS SHAMIM AKHTAR versus MUHAMMAD DIN

A. XLI, on remand August 23, 24 and 25, the plaintiff filed a specific performance claim of the defendant allegedly executed by the defendant in favor of the plaintiff, in his written statement refusing to enforce the agreement. It was held that the trial court's finding and recording of the evidence after compiling the necessary matters was that the plaintiff could give evidence of the execution of the sale agreement and the payment of the allegedly valid views under it. It was a framed document under which the appellate court set aside the trial court's order and order and requested the trial court on remand to obtain the impression of the defendant's thumb for sending it, And then compare the impression of his alleged thumb on the sale deal. After recording the evidence on all the cases, the trial court decided all the cases after deciding the case, but the appellate court accepted the finding without any reason and the trial court had no effect on any matter. Was isolated. Having obtained the remand of the case for recording of judgment and decree and evidence on all matters without justification, the appellate court overruled the provisions of the CPCCO XLI, Rr 23, 24 and 25, rendering the matter irrelevant. Had received the remand by declaration. And the unrelated land; the appellate court did not even raise the appeal in any of the parties; under the circumstances, it exercised its jurisdiction illegally and the appellate court's disputed judgment was dismissed with material misconduct. And the appeal will be considered pending before the Court of Appeal. Of the law within a fixed period famous supreme court advocate from Pak Pattan Sharif lawyer