Find a Lawyer

ALLAH DEWAYA versus HAQ NAWAZ

The sale of the land over Section 42 entitlement was owned by the original owner of 16 Kanal and 16 Marla Khata of the land, of which 8 Kanal 7 was purchased by the defendant's foreclosure by Marla mutation while 8 Kanal land was purchased. Was. Some other vendors have only left the original owner of the 8-acre land suit in the video exchange, with the claimant claiming that 1 killer and 8-Marl of unused individuals are changing sales in favor of it. ? The plaintiff has more than her right to do so she filed a petition with the Revenue Collector to review the relevant change, which was accepted for review, pending the determination of whether the account was actually The owner came after the land was sold to the defendant's predecessor, saying that the second shopkeeper was left with a substantial title in Khata to justify the supply of 1 Kanal 8 Marla for the Tehsildar's plaintiff's report. Revealed that the original owner sold the land to defendant's predecessor and said that the retailer was entitled to only 8/335 shares but Receipt workers were denied their right due to a mistake on 28/335. There was an error in the registrant's rights regarding the relevant year and related mutation which was approved in favor of the plaintiff. The original owner of the suit could not deliver more than 8 Marla and the fact was accepted by the plaintiff's lawyer. registration advocate from Mari Indus lawyer