Find a Lawyer

MUKHTIAR HUSSAIN SHAH versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Conduct Rules (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 and 322 guarantees, no further investigation grant was declared a serious motive for the defendant to be executed with the deceased on empty-handed time and his Was to be attacked by a partner. The accused was in a sudden outburst which resulted in nothing being recovered from his possession during the interrogation of the case without any prejudice. The FIR had no special injury to the accused. I was just a general and collective charge. The F1R against the accused and the co-accused showed that the accused and his co-accused had jointly and collectively thrown fists and slaps on his face after throwing him to the ground, but the post-mortem related to Nash In the inspection report, the deceased was shown to have suffered only two wounds, one on his arm and the other on his knee joint, and no one was hurt on the face of all the investigating officers this late. Air stated in his case diary that this case did not attract the provisions of 5: 302, PPC, but it did attract the offense under 532, the PPC and the offense under section 322, P.K. The PC did not carry any prison sentence. In connection with this case and the accused was involved in a judicial lockup and his physical custody did not require the police to file a case for the purpose of investigative purposes, further investigation of his crime under Section 497 (2). Is demanding CCPC was admitted on bail under the circumstances best advocate from Muzaffargarh lawyer