Find a Lawyer

MASROOR-UD-DIN versus STATE

Sections 497, 498, 439 and 561 of the Crimes of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 16 bail, grant of the accused, who was allowed pre-arrest through trial. Applied for exemption from According to the lawyer, which application was rejected by an impugned order, the complainant's counsel had no objection to the restitution of the accused's original bail, subject to his action that he was required to hear at every trial. Will appear in the trial court and the charges were not heard at all. After the invoice was submitted, the trial court summoned him, he chose to appear before himself and when he informed his lawyer about being unable to appear in court at a later date of hearing, he had to appear in court. Signed an application for an exemption from, but was not allowed by the trial court in charge of the trial, which was under the real impression that his application for waiver would be allowed, said on the date stated The trial court did not appear after the trial court ordered the accused to issue notices for their appearance, but instead His bail was canceled, which was set before the High Court on the allegation of accuracy that he will appear before the trial court on the next date of hearing and will appear thereafter. As long as the complainant had no objection to the approval of the present petition by the end of the trial council, it was allowed and the trial court's invalid order was set aside and the accused was instructed that He appeared before the trial court for a pre-determined date criminal advocate from Shadiwal lawyer