REGIONAL MANAGER, UTILITY STORE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN (PVT.) LTD. versus EMMAD FARID
Section 96 and O XLI, R 1 (1) Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 delayed the appeal, petition for certified copies of the judgment / decree and the expiration of the fixed term of the ban After filing the appeal two days after receiving such copies, the request for condolences on the basis of the delay increase was declared in the absence of the counsel for the appellant / decree unknown. Appellant was not notified by his lawyer. And this appellant found out about the order three days ago, when the respondent asked for its implementation, the lawyer who obtained the certified copy of this judgment / decree never engaged with the appellant. Rather, he was acting before the trial court under the direction of the appellate lawyer's trial court. , After hearing the arguments of the parties, the lawyer declared a decision on the date fixed in his presence; the failure to inform the appellant about the decision of the lawyer's case was not sufficient to delay the appeal for relief. Done.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
