Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IMRAN versus STATE

302 (b) Appraising evidence was an unexpected event to benefit from doubt The medical evidence did not advance the case of the prosecution in any way, which could have been intended to be a strong piece of evidence against the department, was denied by the trial court. What was said and that the basis of the trial court was well established that it was alleged that there was no blood stain, the accused was not linked to the alleged crime, based on the same evidence, the accused was acquitted. Was needed by the trial court to confirm the alleged crime, but in addition to evidence of extra-judicial confession No co-operation against the accused was forthcoming; extra-judicial confession could not prove to be a crime because the evidence of extra-judicial confession was always considered to be a weak category, the prosecution failed to prove the case. ? Beyond the shadows of the accused, the accused was acquitted, giving the suspect the benefit of the doubt attorney vs advocate vs counsel from FR Tank / DI Khan lawyer