Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus STATE

Definition of Section 302 (b) of the three-case trial and the accused were not named in the FIR on the basis of a statement made by the deceased's father during the course of the investigation which was based on mere suspicion. The accused were directly involved in the case. During the trial against the accused, the evidence came on record. The only two evidence that was presented against the accused was in the statement of the prosecution's two witnesses. Both said the witness had openly admitted that he was a witness. The accused cannot be punished for not having witnesses. Such evidence was given by the trial court on the basis of the opinion of the police that the accused was found guilty in the event that it was not acceptable to prove the opinion of the police. In the absence of a conviction can be punished only for the absence of any evidence of the piece, the evidence that was present in the field from the example of the accused was in the form of a knife recovery, the accused on the basis of the knife recovery. Can't be punished especially when there was no blood stain and it was recovered more than nine months after recovery. S had to admit that the knife was not the nature of the case. Evidence and prosecution failed to prove trial against the accused, the accused was acquitted and released on condition jobs for advocates from Parachinar lawyer