RANA NADEEM AHMAD versus ASSISTANT COLLECTOR CUSTOMS, DRY PORT MULTAN
Temporary Review of Sections 81, 194, and 196 Smuggled Vehicles @ Duty @ 25% Indus Motor Company's report confirms the seating capacity of the undercarriage vehicle as it was able to impose 25% duty on vehicles with more than 10 seats. Was able to impose duty on car seats with less than 10 vehicles, while @ 225% authority had directed the appellant to pay 225% duty, which the appellant's tribunal plea maintained that such a report was pending. Not related to the vehicle and cannot be built on that basis. And that he was not given the opportunity to examine its author. The Validatee Tribunal did not consider the facts of the appellant's case, but considered the facts of another case, saying that appellant was correct in claiming that the facts stated in the anonymous decision were not relevant to his case. The High Court set aside the controversial decision and remanded the tribunal for the same decision keeping the facts of the case heard by the parties and the appellant.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Ugoki lawyer
