MST. BASHIR AKHTAR versus HAFEEZ AHMAD ALIAS ABDUL HAFEEZ
In order to recover the possession of section 8, the plaintiff claimed to have occupied the house, accusing her ex-wife of being licensed, that the house of the former wife had been transferred to Dover, the former wife deposed for two years. After her marriage, she moved to the suit house, which she had been given 16 years ago by Dwyer, who had not been examined by her former wife, nor had she been involved with the plaintiff in her marriage. He did not know about a dossier, nor could he specify the date, month, or year at the wedding. In the house where he was given a replacement for a dower, the ex-wife's dower consisted of 8 tools of gold and Rs 20,000: the ex-wife failed to prove her claim. The verdict was pronounced
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
