Find a Lawyer

FAZAZ ABBAS versus STATE

After submitting section 9 (c) and 15 criminal code of conduct (v. 1898), sections 265c and 412 challan, the accused was presented in court and the hearing of the case was adjourned for the appointment of the accused's lawyer. Copies of documents pursuant to Section 65 CC CC, CR, indictment for the confessional offense on the date of adjournment, the trial court; Section 265C, without distributing copies of the statements / documents by the CRPC: and the accused Without the lawyer's appointment, the accused proceeded to record the charges after recording the confessional statements, and the same day, the offender declared them valid. Trial court prima facie hastened to make charges and record confessional statements of defendants without meeting the requirements of Section 265C, CR: CC: CC2, trial for compliance with section 265C Such an error by the court, CCP, could not simply be termed as irregular, but was a serious illegal action that went against the basic principles of the administration of justice and the conviction of the perpetrators was set aside and the trial. The case was heard in the trial court after which the accused was treated. The trial judge will proceed with the trial patent advocate from FR Bannu / Lakki lawyer