Find a Lawyer

SABIR ALI ALIAS KAKA THROUGH SUPERINTENDENT, CENTRAL JAIL versus STATE

The complainant, who benefited from suspicion of section 302 (b) evidence, had modified his earlier statement to show that his father was also last seen, which seemed to be a dishonest improvement even otherwise. The accused's name was not mentioned in the complainant's report. Before the police, but then for the first time it was presented in a supplementary statement, after which three and a half months after the incident, the matter was not immediately reported to the police, but after the victim's body was recovered. Such was the case when the complainant and other witnesses of the prosecution were not present on the occasion when the victim and the accused were allegedly left home in the company of the accused and agreed after that story, after which the last The evidence seen earlier could not be ascertained to the extent of the accused and was rejected. The alleged extra-judicial confession was with the complainant's witness of the crime, both were not councilors or members of the area and before that they did not even know the accused and they did not know the defendant's parentage and residence. Failing to disclose, both said witnesses were not in a position to apologize to the deceased's heirs because of their influence. The alleged extra-judicial confession, made by the accused, the details were not disclosed by the witnesses, in which case the evidence of the alleged extra-judicial confession cannot be relied upon even though the opportunity was disclosed, But there is no report. Just about their comparison to the alleged weapon of the Franz Science Laboratory is recovered. famous high court advocate from Bhakkar lawyer