Section 2 (2 (b)) appreciated, the benefit of the doubt was two cases and if both prescriptions were put in place of juxtaposition, then the possibility of being true of the accused cannot be ruled out because of the accused. One was not exceeded. In this case, the right of self-defense and the participation of the other accused was of suspicious nature. In this case, the FIR was recorded after deliberation and consultation, however one of the accused The medical legal report, although not exhibited by the defense, was available on the record. His cousin was taken to the hospital on the day of his injuries, and on the same day, he was examined by a doctor and was told that the accused's injury and medical examination were also performed at the time of the incident. In harmony, injuries sustained on the person of the accused were suppressed by the prosecution. It can be safely denied that the complainant did not approach the court or the police with open hand, media reports of the injured reported. Disposition can be regarded as negligence by a defense lawyer regarding the contradictions between the ocular account and the medical evidence. Or can be. He showed that the eye witnesses were not present on the spot. If the witnesses were present on the spot, they would have taken the deceased to the hospital and the name of any of them in the relevant column of the friend / relative of the medical report. It is said that, when appearing before the trial court, they tried to bring their case to the medical evidence and there was unprecedented improvement in this regard.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
