HAJI MUHAMMAD ANWAR versus MUHAMMAD AHMED
Section 2 (f) (j) and 15 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) eviction application The relationship between the landlord and the tenant applicant claimed that he was the landlord / landlord in question. The property and its title were denied by the applicant in connection with the premises and stated that the landlord and tenant had no connection between him and the applicant and claimed that he was a resident in his rights. , The rent controller rejected the eviction request, saying that the applicant failed to prove that the landlord and the tenant and their Now the relationship of the dandelion, as he claimed. Below, his wife, the appellate court, set aside the rent controller's decision, but the high court upheld the rent controller's decision and the appellate court's decision was set aside. His father had given him a gift, and he bought 1/3 of his brother from his brother and became the absolute owner of the premises so that the petitioner could not record any evidence of the transaction in his favor. Was. The variable was not awarded to the person whose title the property was converted to in the Court of Justice, in the circumstances correctly concluding that the applicant failed to prove that he was a liar. / Owned or owned by
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Khairpur Nathan Shah lawyer