Find a Lawyer

ABDUL KHALIQ AND ANOTHER versus MUHAMMAD SHAFIQUE

Article 2 ((())): To prove the Supreme Court wrongly and not to read the principles of re-evaluation of evidence, generally using the powers under Article ?55 (power) of the Constitution, The source does not hold back from the harmony of fact, as long as it can be shown that such evidence is on its face, against the evidence or so clearly impossible or false. That accepting it can lead to a serious abortion of justice, or if the principle behind the definition of evidence is misused and, ultimately, physically If it can be demonstrated that criminal proceedings and the rule of the Supreme Court, it is the burden of the applicant to show that the results filed by the High Court are not sustainable on record and thereby Interrogation of the Supreme Court should be interfered with. In fact, interference can be made where finding the facts of the case or finding out the facts is not based on any evidence or inaccurately writing some important documents and relying on certain sections of the document. However, an important point of evidence has not been taken into account when referring to property in dispute No search has been reported. power of attorney advocate Hub Chowki lawyer