MRS. SYEDA TAHIRA MUBASHAR versus MST. ZAKIA KHAN
Section 16 (1) and (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The outstanding collective rent artefact of rent collection was seized by the tenant for the reason that if it was not paid then he would be removed from the premises. Will go when the tenant has contacted. Immediately after the High Court had passed the order under section 16 (1) of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, the absence of any order passed under section 16 (2) of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance. The petition was not eligible, the 1979 High Court rejected the interruption of the order passed by the Rent Controller Petition dismissed in circumstances
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer