Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MRS. SYEDA TAHIRA MUBASHAR versus MST. ZAKIA KHAN


Section 16 (1) and (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The outstanding collective rent artefact of rent collection was seized by the tenant for the reason that if it was not paid then he would be removed from the premises. Will go when the tenant has contacted. Immediately after the High Court had passed the order under section 16 (1) of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, the absence of any order passed under section 16 (2) of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance. The petition was not eligible, the 1979 High Court rejected the interruption of the order passed by the Rent Controller Petition dismissed in circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
Pakistan, top advocate family court from Ahmed pur Sial lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.