Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD NADEEM versus NASIMUDDIN

Sections 14, 15 and 16 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of the Maintenance Tentative Rent Order of Rent Controller After giving notice to the tenant, the landlord did not wait for a legal period of two months and filed for eviction. The rental controller has approved temporary rent. The tenant was instructed and instructed to submit the arrears of rent by the tenant that in the proceedings commenced under section 14 of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979, the tenant controller was not given the option to remain in Sindh. Receive an application under Section 16 (1) of the Rated Premises Ordinance 1979. The option to temporarily pass the rental order was not limited to matters of evacuation, nor was it limited to matters falling under section 15 of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979, nor the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance 1979 section for a leisure application. There was a distinction between 14 and 15. In such cases the scope of the option to temporarily pass the rent order cannot be construed as invalid on the basis of the sanction of the order under section 16 (1) of the Sindh Rated Premise Ordinance, 1979, before the Constitutional Petition. , The reason for proceeding to refer to the High Court through a constitutional petition submitted by the tenants was granted only if the exemption in compliance with the temporary rent order under section 14 (2) of the Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979 was rejected. The order was to control the rent, but due to lack of constitutional petition, premature application Was deleted advocates from Lala rukh lawyer