Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD IRSHAD KHAN versus CHAIRMAN, NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU

Sections 9 (a) (v) and 18 (c) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 4, 9, 14 and 1993 conclude the investigation of the constitutional petition against the accused accused of possessing disproportionate assets from known sources of income. There was an investigation. Six investigating officers authorized four investigative officers believed that the accused was guilty of the crime but in the opinion of NAB's legal department there was no case against the accused. The reason given in each investigation permit was against it. It was alleged by the Director General that the orders of the re-investigation by the National Accountability Bureau were based on the legitimate action of the Director General of the Bureau and the Investigating Officers to order a re-investigation of the matter following the opinion of the Legal Department. Submitting a source report was an abuse. The operation of the law was fraudulent in law, so the re-investigation order of the case was passed with good intentions to harass and humiliate the perpetrators who were accused of the Constitution. K-4, 9 and 14 were violated by the law and no deal was made with him and he was subjected to interrogation and interrogation for a long period of six years. The inquiry began in the year 2001. Meanwhile, the accused was arrested despite the fact that the legal department held that the case was not appropriate for the prosecution, the dignity, honor, good name, name and basic rights of the accused were violated and the accused Had to suffer the scrutiny of the investigation and investigation. For the past six years, authorities have been mocking the law of the investigating agency because of a mistake by its authorities. immigration advocates email from Kallat lawyer