Find a Lawyer

GOVERNMENT OF SINDH THROUGH SECRETARY IRRIGATION AND ANOTHER versus HAJI ABDUL GHAFFAR KHAN

A. XI, R6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Decision on the Claimant's Claim Entered by the Applicants, Respondent Defendant, A. XI, R6, CP. Moved the application under the provisions of c. The respondents' claim is more controversial than the entry in a written statement. The High Court challenged the decision before the Division Bench of the High Court, instead of following the proper and legal decision and the High Court order, which was dismissed by an improper decision. Went on to declare the claim of the High Court defendant and exclude the High Court of Appeal that it was the responsibility of the applicant government to pay specific and explicit admission of the award of the contract, the completion of the project and the final bill. In view of the stigma, there may have been a problem that could have occurred to the applicants B could have been enraged before the entire High Court exercise, was disqualified for unqualified applicants. The law does not have the question of honoring a law passed by a competent court of law. Due question of law was not raised, leave application for appeal which was irregular in view of the record was dropped. best law firm from Kharan lawyer