Find a Lawyer

NASIR ALI ALIAS KHIZAR HAYAT versus MST. TAJ BEGUM

Section 5, Schedule and Section 14 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) suit for dissolution of marriage, was decided by the Family Court, by the Family Court, so that the defendant had all the articles, jewelry and care of the dowry. Refrain from claiming for 's allowance. The petition filed by the petitioner against the judgment and judgment filed by the Family Court was partially accepted, in which the appellate court directed the plaintiff to return the tenant land to the applicant who was the applicant's late father. Had granted her and the decree to dissolve the marriage was upheld by the High Court allowing the petition filed by the plaintiff against the decision of the appellate court, observing that the applicant and other legal heirs of the late As regards the transfer of 10 acres of land granted by the applicant's late father Claims are free to establish. Evidence on record through due process did not indicate whether the separation of 10 was about the applicant's marriage to the defendant by the applicant's late father or in the case of the High Court otherwise. , The circumstances justified the court to adopt a safe way to relinquish the 10 acre land transfer dispute. The affected High Court decision of the jurisdiction suffered a legal impediment to guarantee interference by the Supreme Court. immigration advocates from Wana lawyer