Find a Lawyer

BAHZAD SARWAR versus STATE

Section 498 Telegraph Act (XIII of 1885), Section 25 Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 452 and 506 Pre-arrest Guarantee, along with the denial of Proviso under Section 25 (b) of the Telegraph Act 1885 , 452, PPC, which were all non-bailable offenses brought in the case, he said that although Article 497, the prohibited clause of the CRPC was not attracted but the facts of the case in such cases. To be kept in mind, facts were uncovered that did not guarantee a pre-arrest warrant. The recovery of two photographs of the complainant's sister from the accused was linked to the prosecutor's mobile phone with which the accused had recorded the conversation and the photographs of the complainant were yet to be recovered from him and in this case The appointed arbitrator found that the accused and his accomplices were responsible for the theft at the complainant's home. The accused had been absconding with the law for a long time and was subsequently convicted. Extraordinary concession in the arrest bail could not extend to the accused before the court. immigration advocates email from Phoolnagar (Bhai Pheru) lawyer