Find a Lawyer

IBRAHIM GHULAM MUSTAFA versus STATE

Prior to the arrest, a substantial denial of fine material was available prior to the arrest for linking the alleged offense against the section 498 Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), to praising the disputes raised by the accused's lawyer. For this, a deep appreciation record of the material available was required, which could not be practiced by the High Court at the bail-out stage, one of the main components for the grant of bail before arrest, namely by the complainant or the police. Malicious, was not coming to the content available. Considering pre-arrest bail and subsequent arrest warrant grant, the background of the case was quite different from guaranteeing bail to the prosecution in the background of the case, which would be similar to pressing the prosecution's case. Neither the appropriate nor the required FIR when more than five months had passed and the accused had successfully completed the process of law, the applicant's bail pre-arrest was granted. advocate for immigration from Morgah lawyer