Find a Lawyer

LIAQAT ALI versus THE STATE

Section 302/34 Definition of Evidence There was consistency between medical evidence and ocular evidence, acid evidence was completely contradictory to the ocular version. If both witnesses had seen the incident, their evidence would not have been inconsistent with medical evidence. They would certainly witness. That there was only one fire that led to the dead event in which so many people had fired so many shots, if this were the case, their apparent instability would have been forgiven. A prosecution witness, who was a homeopathic doctor, 1 1/4 mile from where his clinic was located, provided no specific reason for the incident to occur on the day the incident took place, according to the prosecution. According to the version, which was not presented, the accused was not a resident of the village concerned, he resorted to individuality, imitated the shootings, but no crime was recovered on the spot, both witnesses observed each other. In addition to repetition, immoral material has been improved. All the said facts have pointed out that the ocular evidence was neither affirmative nor reliable in the case of version two, and that the defense version was more likely than the circumstances involved in the prosecution's version. His defense request was even quashed by statements from eyewitnesses that the complainant did not have possession of the land and at the time of his cross-examination it was revealed that the incident had caused The incident happened. The fact that the deceased attempted to evict the accused from the recovery of the weapons of crime was useless to the prosecution. First of all because of the bullet from this place best advocate from Mehar lawyer