MUHAMMAD DIN versus MAHBOOB AHMAD
Section 12 Plaintiffs' Sale Agreement Demanded Specific Performance of the Contract for Sale allegedly executed by the Plaintiff by his lawyer and claimed that the plaintiff paid all sales at the time of execution of the contract. Power of attorney was acknowledged by the plaintiff and, however, the defense was determined by the defendant that he intended to grant the jet a lease suit for the defendants only for a period of four years. And executed an agreement that was acknowledged as a lease mama parole record that the plaintiff was illiterate. It was decided before the Registrar Syed Power of Attorney that the power of attorney was identified in the proceedings before the Power of Attorney was marked as a trivial witness of the agreement, and his Later, the defendant opposed himself. Therefore, the material facts / material below have been denied by the courts below that the plaintiff failed to prove the sale consideration consideration but the author of the document appeared as a witness and dismissed that the defendant Has acknowledged the receipt of the money, the plaintiff proved the execution of the agreement by presenting witnesses whose statements were not barred in cross-examination. Defendants failed to disclose the existence of any of the grounds set forth in Section 100, with the CPC dismissing the appeal, supporting its position. \ rn
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Pannu aqil lawyer