Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD TARIQ CHAUDHRY versus KHALID AHMAD

57 and 58 Law Shahadat (10 of 1984), Arts 114 and 129 (E) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution of Non-Sealed Belt Bags Estoppel Applying Principal Judicial proceedings agreed on the counting of votes and signed After accepting the re-counting of the order order sheet in the presence of the parties again, it was announced as the respondent candidate, Pliya, that the applicant had taken the ballot bag for re-counting. Was not made and the statement on the order sheet was later added by manipulation The applicant contacted the controversial polling station From the order sheet signed to approve the re-counting process, the Returning Officer Petitioner diverted the electoral record after a consensus before the Election Tribunal for re-counting the requested election record. The re-counting of ballot papers without sealed bags was an unfair practice that the applicant had neither convinced nor had any justification for accepting the court record without such plea. On the contrary, no strong and unverifiable evidence is to be dismissed, except in the case of the Election Tribunal. Edning are not against the officer. Petitioner was obliged to include his alleged statement and unauthorized addition to his consent in his absence and could not refrain from merely saying that the order sheet was unauthorized increase. In the case of applicants, the bar of estoppel can be applied. Vote with full force the Petitioner with no sealed bags patent advocate from Shahdad Kot lawyer