Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM FAIZ versus EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE), MANDI BAHAUDDIN

Sections 4, 9, 17 and 18 of Punjab Land Rules, 1983, Section 3 and 5 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application issued by the Authority for acquisition of land in question in the possession of applicants for public purpose. Land notification for the notification, was challenged by the applicants alleging that the acquisition did not include public interest. That the funds were not available to the landowners to pay the compensation or to build the hospital and that the misconduct is evident from the fact that the authority has taken action on the owners' backs, the applicants allegedly made Had raised numerous objections to the volleyball action. Attack on their private property and land. There was no emphasis on the objections of the applicants through the Land Acquisition Collector. The authorities needed a question to construct / establish the District Headquarters Hospital, which every body needs and for this purpose, temporary powers should be made that July 1993. I was immediately called the district under question and the operation had been going on for the last 14 years without any independent district headquarters hospital, there was no room to understand that any kind of acquisition. There was a smear of any kind or a smear with an illicit pursuit. Land was needed for the construction of the hospital and was acquired in the interest of the public good The Land Acquisition Collector had already announced the award and if the applicant was not satisfied with the compensation set out in it, Could demand a reference under section 18 of the Acquisition Act 1894 and, in the presence of its proper remedy, award list of supreme court advocates from Kahuta lawyer