Find a Lawyer

MST. BIBI ROZA versus JAN SAID

Sections 42 and 54 of the 54 Declaration of Decree and Order were filed by the defendant in the suit claiming that he was the owner of the suit property and that the defendants had no concern with it. Alias filed a lawsuit with the claim for declaration and injunction. A month after the plaintiff filed a counter suit, an anti-suit was established in which it was claimed that his uncle had purchased the property for his benefit, and that it was with the property courts that the plaintiff had. The concurrent filed by the petitioner is under trial, the change of the defendants' property was affirmed in favor of the plaintiff. Both the courts together found that the defendants are the owners of the suit property and they have changed The unregistered document is preferred in favor of the defendants regarding which was legally affirmed in favor of the defendant. \ If the defendant's uncle allegedly sold the suit property to the defendants, there must be some documentary evidence in this regard. It should only be claimed that his uncle purchased the suit property for his benefit, then in the favor of the plaintiff by the mutation the decree will not suffice if any of the variables can be compared to the unregistered process. Certainly the additional value will be incurred unless the opponents' permanent adverse physical possession is proved, the defendants as owners or in the possession of the entire suit property under the assumption of ownership. Was done and nothing was found on the Revenue Record defendants could not provide evidence that the evidence top advocate from Musafir Khana lawyer