Find a Lawyer

ALI REHMAN versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. THROUGH HOME SECRETARY

Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), Section 115 and AXLI, R31 suit demanded for the declaratory plaintiff to declare that he was the owner of the suit on the basis of the legacy and the defendant had There was no justification for denying it. In connection with the case suit case, the plaintiffs 'court and the appellate court upheld the plaintiffs' superiority in proving the relevant cases with the addition of evidence, but they were excluded by the evidence and independent evidence. Had failed to do. The plaintiff was disputed and cannot be considered sufficient to sustain his claim that the plaintiff had to prove his case by his own evidence and he could not exploit the weaknesses in the defendant's case. He also demanded that the court decide on his legal rights or the responsibility for the existence of the facts, which he asserted, would have to prove that these facts existed, after both the courts were obliged. Had given complete decisions. After discussing the evidence on file and all the professionalism of the matter, there was no legal defect in the decisions made by the courts below, consistent with the evidence on file. All legal formalities were fully implemented and no prejudice was committed. The appellate court below was recorded on each point of the appellate court keeping in view the provisions of the AXLI, R-31, the decisions of the courts below the CPC Was not tainted with. Illegal or irregular and pakistani advocates Mithi lawyer