Find a Lawyer

JAN AGHA versus STATE

Section 6A6A Control of the Narcotic Material Stances Act (XXV of 1997), Section 32 and 74 of the petitioner requested the return of the vehicle from which allegedly 50 kilograms of hashish was recovered, the applicant claimed. It was said that he had also received the carriage and bargain receipt and open transfer letter and registration book. The vehicle in question was not registered in the applicant's name and the transfer letter was not in his name, did not contain a copy of the transfer letter, was the real owner's name or the transferee and it is yet to be proved that it was a genuine Document and at the trial it will be seen whether the applicant was not aware of the crime and if he was not responsible for the proper maintenance of his vehicle to prevent the use of his vehicle. ? A criminal applicant may have a civil lawsuit, yet the vehicle was required for trial purposes and the provisions of Section 32 of the Drug Substances Control Act 1997 are available ground to return the vehicle to the applicant, dismissing the requests. Was done, under the circumstances pakistani advocates Lawrence pur lawyer