Find a Lawyer

DR. NAZAR ALI versus QUTABUDDIN

Section 15 (2) (iv) and 21 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Jurisdiction High Court scope In the constitutional jurisdiction the removal of the tenant due to the substance or utility of the High Court cannot interfere with this decision. Was. The following courts, unless the impeachment order is found to be completely misleading, arbitrary, based on misinterpretation of evidence, resulting in the gross violation of the High Court of Justice in the constitutional jurisdiction. She cannot intervene solely on the basis that on the basis of the evidence contained by the rent controller, another view of the matter, contrary to this, was also possible in the present case, by the landlord no. Evidence was not presented to show how the price of the shop had decreased in the rent controller There was no trace. In this regard and the appellate court's decision was also silent, so the appellate court's decision was based on observations that were not part. According to the evidence, such decision was contrary to the evidence on record, the tenant had erroneously shifted the burden on the tenant and found that he rejected the landlord's allegations because of the need for documentary evidence and independent evidence. Until the landlord proved that raising the question, price and utilities of the shop space suggested that the tenant could not move the burden without changing the rent, he said. The jurisdiction was increased by the two courts and both courts did not exercise their jurisdiction properly. , In accordance with the law, concurrence of the following court inheritance advocates near Abbaspur lawyer