Find a Lawyer

SYED QUTUB AHMED versus SYED FAISAL ALI SUBZWARI

Section & 52 and (68 (?)) of the election petition to revoke the selection of the returning candidate for corrupt and illegal practice, the selection of the applicant / non-candidate was challenged, in this election application, The applicant was initially declared - elected according to unofficial results, in which he claimed to have obtained 1,5126 votes against the claimant, which was shown to have received 15,104 votes, and There was more controversy - first, his envelope containing 88 votes claimed he was polling in his favor, was missing. He said that 88 votes were correct and were excluded from the counting and that the stamps on the votes of different polling stations were of different numbers and did not match the seal of the original polling station, which the Election Authority allocated specific numbers. The applicant did not inspect any witnesses nor asked any election authority officer to determine if any missing envelope containing 8SNs in his favor was used to benefit the respondents. Was destroyed with the intent of the petition, the petitioner had the words of the applicant, inadmissible of any evidence Yes, there was no room for the respondents / non-returning candidates to make unacceptable grounds; the applicant was required to prove the allegations of corruption against the respondents, whereby the applicant applied to the wrong polling seals. Failure to prove the other charge was also made. Based on the misconduct on the ballot, the candidate who is returning to the base, us immigration advocates from Kot Radha Kishan lawyer