SHABBIR HUSSAIN versus STATE
The significant consideration reflected in the grant of a section 497 preventive code (XLV of 1860), sections 324, 353 and 34 bail, the trial court's order over which it did not allow the accused to allow bail, It appeared that the accused was a minor offender. Before instructing the High Court Investigation Officer to appear and disclose, the state's lawyer argued whether a case against the accused was pending, but despite the opportunity provided, the inquiry officer did not appear and the state's The lawyer was also not in that position. To show the possibility of another case against the accused since the accused was involved in ineffective shootings and the charge was against the accused and not the accused, hence the accused was entitled to exemption on bail.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Sohawa District Daska lawyer
