Find a Lawyer

ASIF NASRULLAH KHAN (MINOR) versus HAYAT KHATOON

Section 42 Court Fees Act (VII of 1870), Sections 4, 6, 12 and 28 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), Section 149 Declaration of Principal and Advocate Title, Loss of Relationships and Principles of Recovery of Court Fees Plaintiff is an uneducated and The executing woman was the owner of the suit property and her lawyer transferred the suit land to her own minor son without special permission from her, which, on the basis of the change, the trial court adjourned the case in favor of the plaintiff. Sentenced him to within thirty days and ordered to pay the court fee. And the appellate court, which was approved by the trial court, maintained that the defendant's trial was not related to court-related fees within the time set by the trial court, Obligatory to set aside this order, which is permissible in favor of his own minor, the attorney general's consent to the transfer of the transfer to the son's principal without his permission was a gross violation of such law and The courts below were found to be correct in the judgment and decree, in the case of collection of court fees, against the plaintiff's court. The decision not to supply within the stipulated period of the stamp was provided in the decree and there was no prejudice between the plaintiff and the treasury, especially when the fee was deposited for the delivery of the court delay in the delivery of the stamp fee. Neither intentional nor relevant nor was there any absence of circumstances and consequently the order was not disappointed in the matter of this nature, sufficient justice was done and the illiterate woman through her lawyer. Transfer property advocate from Sehwan lawyer