Find a Lawyer

SIKHAWAT ALI versus STATE

The defendant was one of the accused in appreciating the provisions of Sections 302 (b), 449, 148 and 149; nothing was recovered from the original brother of the two accused, who was convicted and sentenced. During the cross-examination, he also admitted that he had appeared before the investigating officer and said that he was present only to distinguish the victim and that the accused investigating officer had also declared him innocent on the spot. I was skeptical of his actual involvement when, accepting his version, the suspect's term extended to the job, it is doubtful that his conviction and sentence would be set aside. He was acquitted of the charges and the remaining two accused have been released, although they were allegedly equipped with Sutas, but no casualties were reported on the deceased person and only in his firearm. All three were injured. His suspect, Seed Co-accused, was found innocent by the police during the investigation, adding that he was not even detained by the police during the entire investigation but no recovery was received from him. ? His false allegations that he was convicted of a blood relationship with the main accused cannot be denied. Like the two accused, one was to accept his appeal and the sentence given to him was acquitted, separated, and he was acquitted. solicitors from Jalal Pur Priwala lawyer