Find a Lawyer

ZAHID MALIK versus STATE

Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302 interim pre-arrest bail, confirmation of the deceased was a maid's employee in the house of the accused's brother and during the investigation it was confirmed that the real culprit of the victim's murder was a person. The one who was arrested was allegedly involved in the supplementary statement given by the complainant after an interval of 8 days about the accused which could not be relied upon as to the authenticity of the delay. I was born with doubts. There is no provision under the law for recording additional statements because it is equivalent to paying millions in the prosecution's case, which was declared innocent by the Section P Investigation, which found that the inspector ( The accused was not found in the investigation after the investigation. It was found that the accused was involved only in the conspiracy / elimination even though the police ion was not bound by the court, but if it was based on material, it would have a convincing value and could not be lightened on one side. The investigation was completed. And the police didn't have to send the accused to jail anymore. At such a stage, under the circumstances, Prima would not have any beneficial purpose, no direct evidence was on record to link the accused to the commission that proved the crime against him, the accused's bail pre-arrest warrant granted Was done, famous lower court advocate from Taunsa sharif lawyer