Proof of the cost of section (()) and bank loan recovery funds was approved against the interim order which led to the final order issued by the bank in the application for leave and sanctioned against the defendant. Claimed to have included the costs in the order. The ploy raised by the defendant was that without the date of default, the cost of the funds could not be included in the decree when the due date was not disputed, a regular determination was not necessary and the default was The history of can also be taken as the date of the interim decree. Although approved but not complied with. Similarly, the State Bank of Pakistan had fixed the cost of the funds at 6 44 44, as the High Court had pronounced judgment against the defendants with a cost of Rs. 44% from the date of the interim order was decided accordingly
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
