Find a Lawyer

MAHBOOB ALI versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 bail, further investigation grants neither the names of the accused nor any role was assigned to them, nor the names of the witnesses. GO, who involved the accused, witnesses in the FIR told a different story that was contrary to the contents of the FIR, statements made under Section 162, CRPC, showed that the witnesses were killed The complainant was notified of the violence committed by the policemen, which was in fact not mentioned in the FIR and made the statements dubious, as the Secretary 621 The statements were recorded after a delay of three days and were not in accordance with the contents of the FIR:, after the suspect was likely to be found false, other witnesses who examined them earlier The IRC did not involve the contradiction of the accused and the statements made under Section 6262, CRPC, raised suspicion that the benefit of the accused was to lie, it was not an absolute principle that the fugitive accused The names were not eligible for bail because they did not appear in the FIR, and they were involved through the statements made under Section 162, CR PC, the case was appropriate for the accused. For further investigation of the crime and it can be said that there is no reasonable basis to believe that the accused committed a non-bailable offense, two other accused were lodged under Section 62, CRPC. The latter was also involved through subsequent statements and pre-arrest bail was also granted to the principal accused. The rule of consistency, in the circumstances, demanded that the accused be released on bail as well. list of supreme court advocates from Jauharabad lawyer