M. YOUSUF ADIL SALEEM & CO. versus HAMID MASOOD
Sections 7, 32 and 68 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), O xxxxx, Rr 1 and 2 Partnership Claimant (one of the partners) acting as a partner of this firm Prayer with exception to exemption is mandatory for plaintiff to sue the plaintiff for failure to present a case, the balance of the facility was not in favor of the plaintiff because if he was barred from participating in the partnership firm So the defendant can be in big trouble. The firm raised serious objections to the Registrar of Companies since 1986 when it became known that its name was excluded from the partnership firm referred to in section 32 (1) (b) of the Partnership Act, 1932. Not fulfilled If the defendant is prevented from working as a partner in the firm, it will suffer irreparable loss that cannot be paid in terms of money as it will not only result in financial loss but also mental and physical. As a High Court, the Single Judge refused to interfere with the order denying the injunction in the original jurisdiction. \ R \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top advocate from Zhob lawyer